For most small business owners, building a brand is a lifelong dream. For Pamela “Brooke” Schronce, the owner of a once-popular children’s boutique, the dream has transformed into a recurring legal nightmare. On Friday, May 1, the 30-year-old entrepreneur was booked into the Pickens County Detention Center, marking her 17th arrest since the beginning of 2026.

South Carolina Boutique Owner Arrested for 17th Time After Being Accused of Scamming Clients

The latest charges add to a mountain of legal woes for Schronce, whose business, Thomas & Turner Boutique, has become the center of a sprawling fraud investigation involving dozens of victims across South Carolina.

Schronce’s most recent encounter with law enforcement occurred in Pickens County, where she was charged with obtaining money or property under false tokens or letters (less than $2,000). According to online records, she was granted a bond of $1,087.50 and has since been released from custody.

While the dollar amount of the specific charge may seem small, the frequency of Schronce’s arrests paints a portrait of a serial offender. Just weeks prior, on April 6, she was apprehended on two counts of breach of trust with fraudulent intent. The sheer volume of cases—17 in just over four months—suggests a systemic failure to fulfill business obligations that authorities now categorize as criminal intent.

Thomas & Turner Boutique was marketed as a high-end destination for “trendy little babies,” specializing in “custom-designed” clothing. Its Instagram page, filled with soft aesthetics and curated infant fashion, drew in mothers and grandmothers from across the state. However, behind the polished social media presence was a supply chain that victims say didn’t exist.

The Oconee County Sheriff’s Office has been at the forefront of the investigation, detailing stories of customers who waited months for clothes that never arrived.

Deputies Arrest Baby Boutique Owner Again, for 16th Time This Year, in South Carolina

Perhaps the most egregious example of the alleged fraud involves a victim who pre-ordered matching children’s outfits in December 2024. After months of silence, the woman received a partial refund in July 2025—not in cash, but in the form of a $73.02 gift card to the same boutique.

In an attempt to recoup her loss, the victim used the gift card to purchase new items scheduled for delivery in January 2026. Predictably, the items never arrived. To make matters worse, the victim discovered the remaining balance on her card was worthless because Schronce had shuttered the business.

“The victim cannot use the remaining balance on the gift card due to the fact that the business is now closed,” the sheriff’s office stated in a news release.

The Oconee County fraud investigators are currently sifting through a backlog of similar complaints. The investigation remains active as more victims come forward, many of whom describe a pattern of “gaslighting” by Schronce, who allegedly blamed shipping delays and personal issues for the missing merchandise.

Schronce’s attorney, Joy C. Davis, has not provided a formal statement regarding the May 1 arrest. As the case moves toward the court system, the primary challenge for the defense will be explaining how a legitimate business operation resulted in 17 separate criminal bookings in less than 130 days.

The rise and fall of Brooke Schronce serves as a cautionary tale in the age of social media commerce. While Thomas & Turner Boutique appeared to be a successful, “custom” brand, authorities allege it was a hollow shell used to harvest funds from unsuspecting parents.

Upstate boutique owner arrested for fifth time

For the dozens of victims in South Carolina, the 17th arrest brings a small sense of justice, but little hope of financial recovery. With the business closed and Schronce facing a revolving door of court dates, the “trendy little babies” for whom the clothes were bought have likely long since outgrown the sizes their parents originally ordered.

With 17 arrests in a single year, do you believe the current bail system is failing to protect consumers from serial financial offenders, or is Schronce entitled to remain out of custody while awaiting trial?