As the Royal Family marked what would have been Queen Elizabeth II’s 100th birthday with solemn tributes and official engagements, a separate announcement from Meghan Markle quickly drew attention—and controversy. The Duchess of Sussex revealed the launch of two new products under her lifestyle brand, As Ever: candles named after the birthdates of her children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. While the release was positioned as a heartfelt tribute ahead of Mother’s Day in the United States, the timing of the announcement has proven to be deeply divisive.

The products, labeled “No. 506” and “No. 604,” correspond to Archie and Lilibet’s birthdays and are described as carefully crafted scents with personal meaning. Supporters have praised the move as a thoughtful nod to motherhood and family life. However, critics argue that unveiling the products just hours before a significant royal milestone overshadowed a moment intended for remembrance and unity.

Royal observers were quick to highlight the sensitivity of the date. April 21 carries enormous symbolic weight for the monarchy, marking a century since the birth of one of Britain’s most revered sovereigns. King Charles III himself released an emotional tribute to his late mother, while other members of the Royal Family participated in commemorative events. Against this backdrop, Meghan’s announcement was perceived by some as poorly timed at best—and deliberately provocative at worst.

A former palace aide, speaking anonymously, suggested that “there is always an awareness of timing when it comes to royal events,” adding that such decisions are “rarely accidental.” While not directly accusing the Duchess of intent, the aide implied that the overlap would inevitably draw comparisons and criticism.

Online reaction reflected this divide. Some commentators accused Meghan of using her children’s royal titles as part of a commercial strategy, reigniting long-standing debates about the Sussexes’ relationship with the monarchy. One widely shared social media post described the move as “tone-deaf,” arguing that it detracted from a day meant to honor Queen Elizabeth’s legacy.

Others, however, pushed back against the criticism. A branding expert interviewed by a lifestyle publication noted that “product launches are often scheduled weeks or months in advance,” suggesting that the overlap may have been coincidental rather than calculated. “From a business perspective, aligning with Mother’s Day makes sense,” the expert added, emphasizing that commercial timing does not always account for royal calendars.

The controversy also revives a broader discussion surrounding the Sussexes’ departure from royal duties in 2020. At the time, Prince Harry and Meghan stated their intention to step back from official roles while maintaining respect for the institution. Implicit in that transition was an understanding—often interpreted by commentators—that royal titles would not be used for direct commercial gain. Critics now argue that ventures linked to their children’s titles blur that boundary, even if no explicit rules have been broken.

Royal historian Dr. Elaine Carter offered a more measured perspective, noting that “the modern monarchy exists in a complex space between tradition and personal autonomy.” She explained that while expectations remain high, particularly regarding symbolic dates, the Sussexes operate outside formal royal structures. “This creates grey areas where actions can be interpreted very differently depending on one’s viewpoint,” she said.

Public sentiment appears equally divided. While some see Meghan’s actions as a breach of decorum, others view the backlash as disproportionate. A supporter on social media wrote that “celebrating her children and building a business shouldn’t be controversial,” arguing that Meghan is entitled to define her own path after stepping away from royal life.

Still, the timing continues to fuel debate. For many, the issue is less about the products themselves and more about the perceived clash between personal branding and collective remembrance. Queen Elizabeth II’s centenary is not just another date—it represents a moment of national reflection, one that carries emotional weight for both the Royal Family and the public.

In the end, whether Meghan Markle’s announcement was an unfortunate coincidence or a calculated move remains a matter of interpretation. What is clear, however, is that the intersection of royal legacy, personal independence, and public perception continues to generate intense scrutiny. As long as those elements remain intertwined, even seemingly routine decisions are likely to spark outsized reactions.

Promoted Content