In 2025, as the rift between Prince Harry and Prince William continues to dominate headlines, royal experts have revealed a striking perspective: Princess Diana’s presence could have transformed Meghan Markle’s role within the royal family. Had Diana been alive, her empathetic guidance and stabilizing influence might have prevented the tensions that led to Harry and Meghan’s departure from royal duties, reshaping their path and preserving the monarchy’s unity. This revelation, drawn from insights by royal commentators, paints a poignant picture of what might have been.
Diana’s Vision for Her Sons and Their Partners
Royal commentator Charles Rae, speaking to Royal Insider in August 2025, emphasized that Princess Diana would have played a pivotal role in guiding Meghan Markle through the complexities of royal life. “I suspect that [Diana’s] influence would have had a stabilizing effect on Meghan,” Rae said. “She would have shown her American daughter-in-law the good path ahead.” Diana, who nicknamed Harry “Good King Harry” and William “Wombat,” was known for her nurturing approach, fostering confidence and unity in her sons. Her ability to connect with people from all walks of life would likely have extended to Meghan, helping her navigate the royal spotlight.
Diana’s own struggles with the royal institution gave her a unique perspective. Having faced intense scrutiny as an outsider, she would have empathized with Meghan’s challenges as an American entering the monarchy. Rae believes Diana’s mentorship could have kept Harry and Meghan within “the family firm,” preventing their 2020 exit from senior royal duties.
A Peacemaker for a Fractured Family
The strained relationship between Harry and William, exacerbated by Harry’s 2021 Oprah interview and 2023 memoir Spare, might never have reached such heights if Diana were alive. Rae noted, “I firmly believe she would have never allowed it to get this far,” suggesting Diana would have “banged their heads together” to resolve their feud. Her presence could have softened early tensions, such as William’s reported concerns about Harry’s fast-moving relationship with Meghan in 2019, which sparked a heated reaction from Harry.
Diana’s biographer, Andrew Morton, reinforced this view, stating, “Diana always used to say she had two boys for a reason—the younger would be there to support the older in the lonely task as future king.” Her vision of Harry as William’s “wingman” extended to their partners, and she likely would have fostered a bond between Meghan and the royal family, ensuring a collaborative rather than divisive dynamic. Morton believes Diana’s peacemaking skills would have “worked things out in a different way,” potentially keeping the brothers—and their wives—united.
Meghan’s Path Under Diana’s Guidance
Meghan’s integration into the royal family faced challenges from the start, with reports of unease from William and public scrutiny of her non-traditional background. Diana, who faced similar outsider status, would have been uniquely positioned to guide Meghan through the royal protocols and media pressures. “She would have shown her the good path ahead,” Rae said, suggesting Diana’s warmth and media-savvy approach could have helped Meghan carve out a positive role within the monarchy.
Diana’s influence might have also tempered the public fallout from Harry and Meghan’s decisions. Her ability to connect with the public, as seen in her humanitarian work, could have provided Meghan with a model for balancing personal authenticity with royal duty. Instead of the explosive revelations in interviews and Spare, Diana’s mentorship might have channeled Meghan’s energy into constructive royal initiatives, maintaining her and Harry’s place within the family.
Diana’s Enduring Legacy
Patrick Jephson, Diana’s former private secretary, told People that her influence persists through the “good examples” and “warnings” she left for her sons. Despite her death in 1997, when William was 15 and Harry was 12, her lessons about earning public affection through service remain relevant. Jephson noted, “William, Harry, and their advisors will know that she left them many good examples to follow.” Diana’s guidance could have extended to Meghan, helping her align her ambitions with the monarchy’s expectations.
Morton highlighted the loss to the monarchy, stating, “It’s a great loss for the monarchy” that Harry and William’s bond has fractured. Diana’s absence left a void in mediating the brothers’ relationship and integrating Meghan, allowing tensions to escalate unchecked. Her vision of a united royal family, with Harry supporting William and their partners working together, was shattered by her untimely death.
A Royal Family Reimagined
In 2025, as Harry pleads for reconciliation with King Charles and William remains distant, the absence of Diana’s unifying presence is keenly felt. Experts agree her influence could have drastically altered Meghan’s place in the royal family, fostering harmony instead of division. By guiding Meghan, mediating the brothers’ rift, and reinforcing their shared purpose, Diana might have preserved a cohesive royal unit, with Meghan as a celebrated figure rather than an outsider.
What would Meghan’s role look like today if Diana had been there to mentor her? Would the royal family have avoided its current challenges? Diana’s legacy, rooted in empathy and service, continues to inspire questions about the path not taken. Share your thoughts in the comments below.