ROYAL FAMILY IN TURMOIL: In a storm of scandal that’s rocking Buckingham Palace to its core, wild rumours of a hush-hush summit between King Charles and Prince Harry – where explosive DNA tests allegedly revealed Meghan’s children have ZERO Windsor blood – have been brutally shot down as “dangerous lies” by furious insiders. The outrageous claims, swirling like wildfire across the internet, suggest His Majesty confronted his wayward son over cash grabs and titles, brandishing a fake palace document to “expose the truth” about Archie and Lilibet. But hold your horses – Express investigations uncover it’s all smoke and mirrors, with rock-solid evidence proving the Sussex kids are legit heirs, amid Charles’s own health horrors.

Palace sources are seething, telling the Express: “This is vicious gossip preying on a fractured family – utterly baseless and harmful.” As King Charles, 76, continues his brave fight against cancer (diagnosed February 5, 2024, via Buckingham Palace announcement, with treatment wrapping in June 2024 per royal updates), the last thing he needs is this “fabricated farce” dragging the monarchy through the mud.

THE ‘EXPLOSIVE SUMMIT’ EXPOSED: NO MEETING, NO DNA DRAMA

Whispers pin the so-called showdown on Harry’s lightning UK trips – like his solo Coronation fly-in on May 6, 2023, where he was relegated to the third row at Westminster Abbey and bolted back to California within hours, as captured by BBC live footage and reported in The Telegraph. No cosy chats logged; Harry’s bestselling memoir Spare (January 10, 2023, shifting 3.2 million copies in week one, Nielsen BookScan figures) spills on royal rifts but zilch on paternity probes.

Jump to September 2024: Harry’s Invictus Games jaunt saw him at St Paul’s Cathedral on September 10 for a WellChild Awards event, but Freedom of Information releases (detailed in The Times, September 15, 2024) confirm zero royal meet-ups. “If Charles summoned Harry for DNA dirt, it’d leak faster than Megxit,” blasts royal author Tina Brown on her Vanity Fair podcast (episode aired October 2024), calling it “conspiracy claptrap”.

That dodgy ‘Kensington Palace stamp’ doc screaming ‘no Windsor blood’? A hoax, experts roar. UK law under the Human Tissue Act 2004 bans sneaky DNA swabs without consent – slap on fines up to £17.5 million, as the Information Commissioner’s Office hammered home in their 2023 EasyJet data scandal ruling. Palace spox thundered in a 2023 statement: “Invasions of privacy like this are fiction – full stop.”

ARCHIE AND LILIBET’S BIRTH BOMBSHELLS: FACTS THAT SHATTER THE MYTHS

Little Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor entered the world on May 6, 2019, at London’s swanky Portland Hospital – ditching the Lindo Wing tradition where Kate Middleton beamed with Princes George (2013), Charlotte (2015), and Louis (2018), per archived Press Association photos. His official birth cert, lodged with the UK General Register Office (GRO reference accessible online), names Harry and Meghan as parents, backed by midwife Dr. Joanna Bacon’s sign-off. Queen Elizabeth tweaked protocols in April 2019 (Buckingham Palace memo reported in The Guardian) for “modern privacy”.

Princess Lilibet Diana arrived June 4, 2021, at Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital amid Megxit chaos (Sussexes quit duties January 18, 2020). California birth records (Santa Barbara County Clerk, excerpts in Hello! magazine June 2021) confirm the duo as mum and dad. Delayed snaps? Their Archewell Christmas card (December 23, 2021, shot by Alexi Lubomirski) was COVID-cautious – first glimpse of Lili, now 4.

Titles sealed post-Charles’s throne grab on September 8, 2022: Under George V’s ironclad 1917 Letters Patent and the Succession to the Crown Act 2013 (passed March 26, 2013, ending male bias), they’re Prince and Princess, slotted 6th and 7th in line on royal.uk (updated September 9, 2022). No blood tests required – just certified births!

SURROGACY SCANDAL AND ‘MOON BUMP’ LIES LAID BARE

Tales of a shadowy surrogate ‘JG’ pocketing $750,000 with gagging NDAs? Poppycock, fact-checked to oblivion by Snopes (March 2023 update) and Reuters (June 2021 dispatch). Meghan’s bump was real – she bared all on ultrasounds in her Oprah bombshell (CBS, March 7, 2021, 49.1 million viewers per Nielsen). “Belly folds? Camera tricks and maternity wear,” shrugs OBGYN Dr. Sherry Ross in People mag (May 2019 interview).

Doll swap nonsense? Archie’s ginger locks echo Harry’s kiddie pics from Princess Diana’s 1985 albums (Kensington Palace vaults). Child guru Dr. Harvey Karp told USA Today (2022): “Tots morph monthly – lighting plays tricks.” Surrogacy’s legal in Cali (Family Code 7962, updated 2013), but zero links here, per court records searches.

WHY THE ROYAL RAGE? PRIVACY WAR IN A DIGITAL HELLSTORM

Harry and Meghan’s Montecito empire – $100 million Netflix mega-deal (September 2, 2020, Variety scoop) and defunct Spotify gig (axed June 15, 2023, with $20 million whispers in WSJ) – fuels “cashing in” cries. Their Netflix smash Harry & Meghan (December 8, 2022) clocked 81.55 million hours viewed in days. Backers hail their mental health push via Archewell (2023 report: 1.2 million helped), but detractors slam selective sharing.

YouGov polls (September 2024) reveal 62% Brits back kids’ privacy (up from 55% in 2021), yet 48% brand Sussexes “monarchy wreckers” post-Spare. Meghan’s biracial bombs (Oprah chat) sparked hate surges – Hope Not Hate tracked 41% abuse spike in 2021.

Social feeds fan flames: #MegxitLies hit 500,000 TikToks (Brandwatch 2023 data), algorithms juicing drama 30% (Meta’s 2023 report). Tabloids thrive, but Meghan’s wins like her 2021 Mail on Sunday privacy victory (£1 nominal damages, December 2, 2021) bite back.

PALACE INSIDERS: ‘ENOUGH IS ENOUGH – PROTECT THE INNOCENTS’

Charles’s Coronation nod to Harry (balcony glimpse, May 6, 2023 BBC cams) shows olive branches, but aides warn: “This erodes the Crown’s dignity.” Sovereign Grant (£86.3 million for 2023/24, Treasury report July 2024) could face grilling if lies linger.

Constitutional boffin Dr. Craig Prescott (Bangor Uni) warned in The Independent (January 2023): “Parliament probes only with proof – and there’s none.” As Harry hits 41 and Charles heals, the Express demands: Time to bury these toxic tales?

Royal fans, is this privacy win or public betrayal? Sound off below – but keep it factual!