On the 28th anniversary of Princess Diana’s tragic death, her younger brother, Charles Spencer, the 9th Earl Spencer, has broken his long-held silence, revealing shocking details about the events surrounding her life, death, and funeral. His revelations, shared through social media posts and a poignant YouTube video, have sent shockwaves through the royal family, leaving King Charles III and Queen Camilla reportedly stunned and speechless. Spencer’s candid reflections not only honor his sister’s memory but also challenge the royal family’s narrative, exposing painful truths about the treatment of the People’s Princess.
A Heartfelt Tribute on a Painful Anniversary
On August 31, 2025, Charles Spencer marked the 28th anniversary of Diana’s death by sharing a heartfelt tribute on Instagram. Posting images of a bouquet of pink and white roses from Althorp Estate’s gardens and the private island where Diana is buried, he wrote, “Flowers we cut this morning from Althorp’s gardens for the Island. Always an impossible day.” This poignant gesture underscored the enduring grief felt by Diana’s family, as the world remembered the Princess of Wales, who died at 36 in a Paris car crash on August 31, 1997, alongside her partner Dodi al-Fayed and driver Henri Paul.
Spencer’s tribute was not just a moment of remembrance but a prelude to a deeper revelation. In a YouTube video titled Princess Diana’s Brother Breaks Silence on Diana, Leaving Everyone Speechless, he detailed previously undisclosed aspects of Diana’s struggles and the controversial decisions made after her death, particularly regarding her sons, Prince William and Prince Harry. His words have reignited discussions about the royal family’s handling of Diana’s legacy and their role in her life’s challenges.
The Funeral Procession: A Painful Betrayal
One of Spencer’s most shocking claims centers on the decision to have Princes William, then 15, and Harry, just 12, walk behind their mother’s coffin during her funeral procession on September 6, 1997. Watched by over 2.5 billion people worldwide, the image of the young princes, pale and somber, walking alongside their father, King Charles (then Prince Charles), grandfather Prince Philip, and Spencer himself, became an enduring symbol of grief. However, Spencer revealed that this was not the boys’ choice, contrary to what he was told at the time.
According to Spencer, when Buckingham Palace informed him of the plan, he vehemently opposed it, calling it “cruel” and “unnatural” to force grieving children to parade their pain before the world. He argued that Diana would have been horrified by the idea, but palace officials insisted that William and Harry wanted to participate. Reluctantly, Spencer stepped back, believing he was respecting their wishes. Years later, Prince Harry revealed the truth: they had been given no choice. “I had unknowingly stepped aside for something I would never have allowed had I known the truth,” Spencer said, his voice heavy with regret. Harry later described the experience as “numb” and traumatizing, a sentiment echoed by William, who said no child should endure such an ordeal.
This revelation has cast a harsh light on the royal family’s decision-making, with Spencer’s claim that he was misled suggesting a deliberate manipulation to ensure the procession aligned with royal protocol. The public’s outrage at the time, coupled with Spencer’s recent disclosures, has reignited criticism of the monarchy’s perceived insensitivity.
A Scathing Eulogy That Shook the Monarchy
During Diana’s funeral at Westminster Abbey, Spencer delivered a eulogy that remains one of the most powerful moments in royal history. Describing his sister as “the most hunted person of the modern age,” he directly criticized the media for their relentless pursuit and subtly rebuked the royal family for failing to protect her. His most striking promise was that Diana’s “blood family” would guide William and Harry in the “imaginative, loving way” she intended, a statement widely interpreted as a challenge to the Windsors’ authority over the princes. The spontaneous applause from the crowd inside and outside the Abbey was unprecedented for a royal funeral, signaling public support for Spencer’s bold stance.
Spencer’s words were a direct affront to the royal family, who sat stoically as he spoke. The Queen remained emotionless, and Charles showed no reaction, but the impact was undeniable. His speech not only honored Diana’s compassion and humanity but also highlighted the monarchy’s detachment, a theme he has continued to emphasize over the years. Spencer later admitted that keeping his promise to protect William and Harry was “impossible” due to their deep entrenchment in the royal system, but his commitment to Diana’s legacy remains unwavering.
The Royal Family’s Silence and Public Backlash
Spencer’s revelations also shed light on the royal family’s initial response to Diana’s death, which he described as a period of “confusion, silence, and frustration.” When news of the Paris crash broke in the early hours of August 31, 1997, Spencer was in South Africa, awakened by a phone call confirming Diana’s severe injuries. A second, colder call soon followed: “She didn’t make it.” While the public poured into the streets, leaving thousands of flowers outside Buckingham and Kensington Palaces, the royal family remained at Balmoral Castle, issuing no public statement for days. This silence was perceived as indifference, fueling public anger and headlines accusing the monarchy of betrayal.
The Queen’s eventual address on September 5, praising Diana as an “exceptional and gifted human being,” came too late for many, who felt the monarchy had failed to mourn alongside the nation. Spencer’s frustration was palpable, as he believed the royal family had distanced themselves from Diana both in life and death, leaving her vulnerable to the paparazzi who chased her to her demise. He has consistently blamed the media’s relentless pursuit and the royal family’s failure to provide adequate security post-divorce, arguing that Diana, as the mother of the future king, deserved better protection.
Diana’s Legacy and Harry’s Rebellion
Spencer’s revelations resonate deeply with Prince Harry, who has drawn parallels between his mother’s experiences and those of his wife, Meghan Markle. In 2020, Harry and Meghan’s decision to step back from royal duties and move to the United States was a bold echo of Diana’s attempts to break free from the monarchy’s constraints. Harry has spoken openly about the trauma of the funeral procession and the media scrutiny that haunted his mother, admitting that paparazzi cameras still trigger memories of her death. He cited the lack of support for Meghan, who faced similar media harassment, as a key reason for their departure, vowing not to let history repeat itself. Spencer, while not publicly commenting, is believed to quietly support Harry’s choice, given his own decades-long criticism of the royal system.
On July 29, 2025, Spencer further honored Diana by sharing a childhood photo from their time at Park House, Sandringham, on the 44th anniversary of her wedding to Charles. The black-and-white image showed the siblings proudly displaying swimming badges, a nostalgic memory that touched royal fans, who noted resemblances to Prince George and Princess Charlotte. This post, coupled with his ongoing reflections, underscores Spencer’s role as the custodian of Diana’s memory, ensuring her legacy endures through personal tributes and public advocacy.
A Time Capsule of Diana’s Era
Adding to the wave of remembrance, a time capsule buried by Diana in 1991 at Great Ormond Street Hospital was recently opened, revealing relics of the early ‘90s: Kylie Minogue’s Rhythm of Love album, a Casio pocket TV, a passport, a Sunday Times newspaper, and a photo of Diana. These items, encapsulating her era, serve as a reminder of her cultural impact and the public’s enduring affection for her.
A Legacy That Continues to Challenge
Charles Spencer’s decision to speak out after 28 years has not only rekindled memories of Diana’s warmth and compassion but also exposed the royal family’s shortcomings in supporting her. His revelations about the funeral procession, the royal family’s silence, and Diana’s isolation have left King Charles and Queen Camilla grappling with renewed scrutiny. As Spencer continues to honor his sister’s memory at Althorp, where he visits her grave almost daily, his words carry a powerful message: Diana’s story is one of injustice, and her blood family will never let it be forgotten.
For the royal family, Spencer’s outspokenness is a stark reminder of the divide between the monarchy and the public, a gap Diana bridged with her humanity. As Prince Harry carries forward her legacy by challenging the same system, Spencer’s revelations ensure that Diana’s voice, through her brother, continues to resonate, leaving the world—and the royals—speechless.
